Home
Search results “Medical review articles”
Writing a Review Article: Choosing a Topic
 
11:08
This is the first in a series designed to help students in writing a scientific review article. This video shows n easy method to use search tools and academic databases to figure out what you want to write and whether or not there is enough in the literature to write about.
Views: 16041 ProfessorBrownETSU
Review Articles | Scientific Writing |
 
04:29
Download TeachGlobal App from https://teachglobal.com/app for more lectures!
Views: 14966 TeachGlobal
PubMed: Finding primary research and review articles
 
05:32
Using PubMed to find primary research articles and review articles.
Views: 25533 gersteinlibrary
How to Get Published in a Peer-Review Journal: Presentation
 
26:40
Bob Löwenberg, MD, PhD Blood Editor-in-Chief Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherland
About Elsevier Clinics Review Articles
 
02:04
Clinics Review Articles provide timely, topic-based reviews to save time, stay current, and improve outcomes. The Clinics helps institutions provide librarians, students and staff with an authoritative and continuously updated clinical information resource that covers all of their relevant specialties, and is a trusted and comprehensive resource that gives clinicians deep insights on the latest advancements in their field and how to apply them in practice. There are nearly 60 different Clinics titles, each one covering a distinct area of surgery, medicine, veterinary medicine, nursing, and dentistry. To learn more visit info.theclinics.com
What is a Review Article?
 
02:48
WHAT IS A REVIEW ARTICLE?: This short video by John Bond of Riverwinds Consulting discusses Review Articles or Lit Reviews. FIND OUT more about John Bond and his publishing consulting practice at www.RiverwindsConsulting.com JOHN'S NEW BOOK is “Scholarly Publishing: A Primer” To find out more about the book: https://www.booksbyjohnbond.com/about-scholarly-publishing Buy it at Amazon: http://amzn.to/2jqaLPp SEND IDEAS for John to discuss on Publishing Defined. Email him at [email protected] or see http://www.PublishingDefined.com CONNECT Twitter: https://twitter.com/JohnHBond/ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/johnbondnj/ Google+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/113338584717955505192/ Goodreads: https://www.goodreads.com/user/show/51052703-john-bond/ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/JohnBond/ TRANSCRIPTS Hi there. I am John Bond from Riverwinds Consulting and this is Publishing Defined. Today I am going talking about Review Articles. A Review Article is one that summarizes the current state of knowledge about a topic or an idea. In academic publishing, it usually summarizes published studies or articles about that topic. Typically, it does not report new findings or new facts. Sometimes Review Articles are also known as Literature Review or a Lit Review Article, or sometimes Survey Articles. Many scholarly journals will include the Review Article format as an option for publication. Some journals are solely devoted to the format and they are called Review Journals. Many times, journals prefer to solicit Review Articles from specific invited authors who are experts in that field as opposed to having them be considered unsolicited. Review Articles are primarily literature reviews and therefore are considered secondary sources since they do not contain original research or findings. They center on the key articles or literature to understanding that topic. These articles can become some of the most read/most downloaded articles for a journal as readers may turn to them time-and-time again to fully appreciate the topic and the seminal literature connected to it. Journals that try to cultivate a high Impact Factor may intentionally include these articles for the reason of them being highly cited. Review Articles, aside from being a source of a definitive literature review, also help identify gaps in research, focus on topics still under debate, and help to point towards where future research might concentrate its efforts. One of the most valuable goals a Review Article can have is to draw connections between the articles mentioned or the studies examined. Authors writing Review Articles should not shy away from drawing conclusions as the articles are not simply bibliography. Review Articles or Literature Review Articles will remain a mainstay of scholarly communications and research. Well that’s it. I am a publishing consultant and work with associations, publishers, and individuals on a host of content related challenges. Reach out to me with your questions. Hit the Like button below if you enjoyed this video. Please subscribe to my YouTube channel or click on the playlist or more videos about academic publishing. And make comments below. Thank so much and take care.
Views: 3358 John Bond
How to write a literature review
 
09:21
How to write a literature review. It’s easier than you might think! In this video, I demonstrate how to search the literature and identify relevant papers for your literature review. I do a pubmed search using Boolean operators and MeSH terms (these are extremely powerful tools that will help you sift through the large number of academic papers out there). So if you’re doing a master’s thesis or a PhD, or you’re doing research and writing a paper, at some point, you’ll need to do a lit review. A big part of that review is the search and this video is going to help you get that right. You might be doing a systematic literature review or meta-analysis – again, you’ll need to do a good PubMed search that identifies the right studies. Thanks to BMC !!! ----------------------------- This video was sponsored by BMC – (click here to go to BMC: https://goo.gl/RFaUA2 ). As a pioneer of open access publishing, BMC has an evolving portfolio of high-quality peer-reviewed journals including broad interest titles such as BMC Biology and BMC Medicine, specialist journals such as Malaria Journal and Microbiome, and the BMC series. BMC is committed to continual innovation to better support the needs of research communities, ensuring the integrity of the research we publish, and championing the benefits of open research. BMC is part of Springer Nature, giving us greater opportunities to help authors connect and advance discoveries across the world. I’m particularly excited about having BMC’s support because I’ve been working with them for nearly 15 years as the Editor-in-Chief of the journal Globalization and Health. I’ve been extremely impressed by them as a company that has integrity and that is truly making the world a better place. LEARN MORE about literature reviews ------------------------------------------------------------ Of course, there is more to a literature review than just the search. You need to have a structured approach to selecting paper, extracting data, writing the review itself and creating a bibliography. For more detail on these aspects of a literature review, go to www.learnmore365.com where I have a full course on literature review (it takes about 30 minutes to complete). About this channel ------------------------------ This channel posts global health and public health teaching videos and videos about how to find the right job in global health. If you haven't already, please consider subscribing to this channel and becoming part of this community. SUBSCRIBE: -------------------- Click here: https://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=YourChannelNameHere LETS CONNECT: --------------------------- Twitter: @drgregmartin Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/drgregmartin/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thisweekinglobalhealth/ SUPPORT THIS CHANNEL ----------------------------------------- Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/drgregmartin
What are systematic reviews?
 
03:24
Summary: This video explains why systematic reviews are important and how they are done. This includes an explanation of how the effects of interventions are compared in order to provide evidence. Attribution/credits: Prepared by the Cochrane Consumers and Communication Group, La Trobe University and generously support by Cochrane Australia. Written by Jack Nunn and Sophie Hill. Watch in French: https://youtu.be/ds6IekS3ytE cccrg.cochrane.org. Animation by Shakira Moss, Doodler Animation - doodler.com.au
Views: 125212 Cochrane
Writing the Literature Review (Part One): Step-by-Step Tutorial for Graduate Students
 
05:22
Take the mystery out of this academic assignment. All you do is: (1) Gather the summaries of your sources. (2) Put the summaries in groups based on theme. (4) Write a paragraph on each group of sources with transitions between each source. 4. Add introduction and conclusion paragraphs. You're done! For examples of previously written literature reviews, see: http://libguides.uwf.edu/c.php?g=215199&p=1420828
Views: 1148845 David Taylor
Literature Review, The Principles to Medical Research and Publication, Part I
 
22:38
An effective Literature Review saves a lot of unnecessarily work, and effort. This video gives the fundamentals to conduct this discipline effectively. You can follow us on: https://www.facebook.com/Research-School-for-Medical-Professionals-279200612536969/?ref=bookmarks
Views: 3638 Mohamed Elawdy
New Review Article Series: Frontiers in Medicine
 
04:58
Elizabeth G. Phimister, Ph.D. and Lisa Caulley, M.D., M.P.H., introduce Frontiers in Medicine, a new series from the New England Journal of Medicine. Frontiers in Medicine highlights advances at the intersection of science and medicine. Authored by leading experts, each article provides detailed explanations and reviews current evidence supporting clinical practice and challenges for future applications. View the first article in the series, "Chimeric Antigen Receptor Therapy," by Carl H. June, M.D., and Michel Sadelain, M.D., Ph.D.: https://nej.md/2tPkmBW
Views: 716 NEJMvideo
Finding Review Articles and Comparative Studies in PubMed
 
07:44
This tutorial shows you how to find Review Articles and Comparative Studies for your drug for the Medical Pharmacology Assignment.
Views: 392 BUAML
How To Write An Article Review (Definition, Types, Formatting)
 
06:57
In this video, James from EssayPro explains how to write an article review from start to finish. In the beginning, James states an article review is a critical, constructive evaluation of literature in a particular field through summary, classification, analysis, and comparison. If it is a scientific review article that uses database searches to portray the research. The article review is broken down into 5 core parts: Summarization, classification, analysis, critiques, and comparison. These core parts require one to use theories, ideas, and research, relevant to the subject area of the article. Afterward, James mentions that there are different types of article reviews. First of all, there is the journal article review which will evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of an article. Next, there is the research article review which differs from a journal article review by the way that it evaluates the research methods used and holds that information in retrospect to analysis and critique. Lastly, there is the scientific article review which involves anything in the realm of science. Often, scientific articles include more information on the background that you can use to analyze the article in a more comprehensive way. Afterwards, James explains the importance of properly formatting an article review. The steps involved in this process are: 1. Pre-title page: here, you will want to list the type of the article that you are reviewing, the title of the article, all the authors who contributed to the article, authors affiliations (position, department, institute, city, state, country, email ID) 2. Optional corresponding author details: name, address, phone number, email, and fax number. 3. Running head: This is only in APA format. It is the title of your paper shortened to less than 40 characters. 4. Summary page: This can be optional, depending on what your instructor assigns. The summary should be a maximum of 800 words long. Use simple and non-technical language. Do not repeat text verbatim or give references in this section. 5. Title page: which will contain your title (obviously) 6. An Introduction 7. The Body: Include headings and subheadings 8. A Works Cited/or References page 9. Possibly followed by Tables and Figure legends (if instructed by the professor) After finishing your rough draft, make sure to do these last 3 steps: 1. Summarize the Article Make a summary of the article by revisiting what the author has written about. Note relevant facts and findings of the article. Include the author's conclusions in this section. 2. Critique the Article Present the strengths and weaknesses that you have found in the article. In addition, highlight the knowledge that the author has contributed in the field. Also, write about the gaps and contradictions in the article. Take a standpoint of either supporting or not with the author's assertions but support your arguments with facts and relevant theories that are pertinent to the area of knowledge. Rubrics and templates can also be used to evaluate and grade the person reviewing the article. 3. Crafting a Conclusion In this section, revisit the key points of your piece, your findings of the article, and your critique. Also write about the accuracy, validity, and relevance of the results of the article review. Give the way forward for future research in the field of study. Lastly, re-read your piece a day after you finished writing it. This will help you spot grammar mistakes and see any flaws in the organization so you aren’t having to make tons of revisions due to small errors.
Views: 9907 EssayPro
Review of Low Back Pain Article from Harvard Medical School by Dr Ryan Hetland
 
02:59
The 3 Minute Chiropractic Video - Dr Ryan Hetland www.DrRyanHetlandBlog.com www.BackPainReliefMN.com
Writing a Scientific Literature Review / Academic Writing
 
17:59
Tips and guidance for writing a scientific literature review. This screencast video combines work and comments from a DkIT graduate with overview comments from Dr. Ronan Bree, lecturer at Dundalk Institute of Technology. Many thanks to the student for allowing their work to be used as an exemplar (please note the student wished to remain anonymous).
Views: 6715 Bree Bio
How to Write a Paper in a Weekend (By Prof. Pete Carr)
 
11:39
In this video, Prof. Carr (faculty member at the University of Minnesota, Department of Chemistry) is explaining the Algorithm of writing a paper in a weekend.
How to Write a Literature Review
 
12:01
A Literature Review is an objective, concise, critical summary of published research literature relevant to a topic being researched in an article. The two most common types of literature reviews found in journals are those introducing research articles (studies and surveys) and stand-alone literature analyses. They differ in their scope, length, and specific purpose. This video provides a detailed explanation of what do include, what not to include, how to structure, and how to compose a literature review from start to finish. Related YouTube videos: "How to Write a Research Paper Introduction" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTC-5P1VFFU) "Which Verb Tenses to Use in a Research Paper" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gcuL_IaRtXc) "How to Write an Abstract for a Research Paper" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JMEnRBss6V4) "How to Write a Research Paper Title" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fl1q-I3bE0c) Wordvice Resources Page "Useful Phrases for Academic Writing" (https://wordvice.com/useful-phrases-for-writing-academic-papers/) "Common Transition Terms in Academic Paper" (https://wordvice.com/common-transition-terms-used-in-academic-papers/) "Active and Passive Voice in Research Papers" (https://wordvice.com/video-should-i-use-active-or-passive-voice-in-a-research-paper/) "100+ Verbs That Will Make Your Research Writing Amazing" (https://wordvice.com/recommended-verbs-for-research-writing/) "Tips for Paraphrasing in Research Papers" (https://wordvice.com/a-guide-to-paraphrasing-in-research-papers-apa-ama/) External Resources University of Minnesota. "Guidelines for Writing a Literature Review." (http://www.duluth.umn.edu/~hrallis/guides/researching/litreview.html) The UNC Writing Center. "Literature Reviews." (https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/literature-reviews/) Wordvice offers editing services in several languages and countries: ENGLISH: https://www.wordvice.com KOREA: https://www.essayreview.co.kr JAPAN: https://www.wordvice.jp CHINA: https://www.wordvice.cn TAIWAN: https://www.wordvice.com.tw TURKEY: https://www.wordvice.com.tr
Editing: Things they don't tell you about what journal editors want
 
21:02
Pippa Smart, independent publishing and research communications consultant and Editor-in-Chief of the journal, Learned Publishing, provides some insights into the ‘black box’ of editorial decision-making and how authors can improve their chances of article acceptance. Recorded 6 July 2016 at a MedComms Networking event in Oxford. Produced by NetworkPharma.tv = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = ABSTRACT: Many authors are mystified both by the time it takes to publish work, and by the reasons for its being rejected or accepted only subject to revisions. The process of publication is actually straightforward. Following initial checks for completeness, suitability and plagiarism, high-impact journals tend to reject 70% or more of papers immediately, i.e. within a week or so, while those with less strict criteria will reject at least 30% of submissions. The commonest reasons are that the work is out of scope of the journal, or the quality is insufficient for a variety of reasons, from lack of originality, to flawed science and poor quality writing or overall structure. The review process is generally very time-consuming. It is standard practice to have three reviewers per article; one or two may be suggested by the authors, though not necessarily accepted. Recruiting these reviewers may require eight or more invitations. An editor will normally allow two weeks for review; however, deadlines are frequently missed, and the reviews received may be contradictory or unhelpful, necessitating a further round of reviewer recruitment or sometimes arbitration by an additional reviewer. Acceptance without changes following review is rare; the most common decision by an editor is to request revisions, which may be minor or major. Authors can greatly improve their chances of acceptance by carefully reading journal author guidelines, checking journal scopes to ensure that they submit to a suitable journal, and submitting good quality work. A good article will be attractive to a journal editor, communicate its message clearly and concisely, and encourage citation. Written by Penny Gray, Freelance Medical Writer = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = We are building a library of free webcasts, like this one, for the global MedComms Community and others at http://www.networkpharma.tv and we’d welcome your suggestions for new topics and speakers. Full details of this MedComms Networking event are at http://medcommsnetworking.com/event75.html Pippa’s presentation (PDF format) is at http://medcommsnetworking.com/presentations/smart_02_060716.pdf Pippa’s Linkedin page is at https://www.linkedin.com/in/pippa-smart-2b6b2a2/ More about PSP Consulting can be found at http://www.pspconsulting.org Filming and technical direction by Mario Crispino, Freelance Cameraman & Editor [For the avoidance of doubt: this video is intended to be freely accessible to all. Please feel free to share and use however you like. Cheers Peter Llewellyn, Director NetworkPharma Ltd and Founder of the MedComms Networking Community activity at http://www.medcommsnetworking.com]
Views: 16448 MedComms
How to use Google Scholar to find journal articles | Essay Tips
 
06:34
My second essay tips video. Conducting a comprehensive literature review is an important part of any research project. Here are my tips for how to use Google Scholar effectively to quickly and easily find the academic papers, journal articles or books you need to write that essay or complete that dissertation. This is the second in a series of videos I'm hoping to produce while undertaking my PhD at the University of Exeter on tips for students at university or college whether undergraduate, postgraduate or otherwise. Further Reading The Academic Skills Handbook by Diana Hopkins and Tom Reid US: https://amzn.to/2NBDAnf UK: https://amzn.to/2NBJIfb The Study Skills Handbook by Stella Cottrell US: https://amzn.to/2NDeIvh UK: https://amzn.to/2OTyneu [The above are affiliate links. I receive a small kickback from anything you buy which, in turn, helps to support the channel.] If you've enjoyed this video and would like to see more including my What The Theory? series in which I provide some snappy introductions to key theories in the humanities as well as PhD vlogs in which I talk about some of the challenges of being a PhD student then do consider subscribing. Thanks for watching! Twitter: @Tom_Nicholas Website: www.tomnicholas.com
Views: 68261 Tom Nicholas
How to Review a Manuscript
 
05:17
Learn how to write a peer review. This video guides peer reviewers through the process of reviewing a scientific manuscript and writing a peer review. We’re going to walk you through three main elements of peer review: - being invited to review a manuscript - reading the manuscript, and - writing the peer review Read more at the PLOS Reviewer Center (http://reviewers.plos.org) ==When you're invited to review== First, let’s talk about what to do when you’re invited to review a manuscript. When you get an invitation, ask yourself three simple questions to help you decide whether to accept or decline: - Do you have the right expertise to comment on the manuscript? - Do you have enough time to do the review by the deadline? - Can you provide an objective review and are you free of any competing interests? You should only consider accepting the invitation if you can answer yes to all of these questions. ==When you read a manuscript== It’s a good idea to read the whole manuscript first. Then read through it again and focus on specific sections. Take lots of notes as you go and mark down specific sections and page numbers so you can keep track of the points you want to discuss. The first thing you should do is figure out what the manuscript is about. Do the authors identify the main question and key claims? These should be clearly stated in the introduction. The authors should also discuss related research and explain how the study fits into that context. Then look at the figures and tables along with the results. Do the results line up with what’s being shown? Make sure you also pay attention to the methods and study design. Are the methods appropriate? Does the study follow relevant reporting guidelines and meet ethical standards? Then read the conclusions: Are they supported by the data and results? ==When you write the review== When you’re ready to start writing, find out how the review needs to be formatted and submitted. Some journals might have a structured form with specific questions to respond to. You should also find out if you will need to recommend a decision, like minor or major revision. This information might be in your invitation letter, in the reviewer guidelines, or in the online system. Follow an outline to keep your comments organized and easy to read. Think about it like an upside-down triangle, with the key message at the top followed by evidence and examples, then additional details at the very bottom. Start off by summarizing the research in your own words and stating your overall impression. Then use the middle section to provide detail on what the authors need to do to improve the manuscript. Divide this section into major issues and minor issues. - Major issues are the essential things the authors must address before the manuscript is considered further. Make sure you focus on what is fundamental for the current study. In other words, it’s not helpful to recommend additional work that would be considered the “next step” in the study. - Minor issues are still important but are smaller in scope and don’t affect the overall conclusions. Use this section to mention things like including additional references, clarifying the language, or adding more context. Finally, add any confidential comments to share privately with the journal editors. This is where you might state if you have any competing interests. You can also raise concerns about ethics or misconduct, though in these cases it’s a good idea to get in touch with the journal staff directly as well. Follow us on Twitter! https://twitter.com/PLOS ==Credits== "Thinker" Flickr, bobistraveling Moby - "Sunspot" - www.mobygratis.com Adam Vitovsky - "The Stratosphere" - www.adamvitovsky.com
Views: 10662 PLOS Media
Elsevier's Clinics Review Articles
 
01:33
Save time, stay current, and improve patient outcomes with Elsevier Clinics Review Articles! Watch a preview of our Clinics Review Articles in the video above, and begin browsing our entire selection in print, eBook, and app formats at http://www.us.elsevierhealth.com/us/searchResults.jsp?title=Clinics%20Review%20Articles&productTitle=Clinics&dmnum=null&elsca1=CriticalCare&elsca2=soc_med&elsca3=null&elsca4=youtube_ELSpromovideos Visit our bookstore to shop for this title: US & Latin America: http://bit.ly/16mVKhy Canada: http://bit.ly/14lYZIe UK: http://bit.ly/rqJe75 Africa & Middle East: http://bit.ly/19Ag9D5 Asia: http://bit.ly/h3zIsl
What is PEER REVIEW? What does PEER REVIEW mean? PEER REVIEW meaning & explanation
 
06:40
What is PEER REVIEW? What does PEER REVIEW mean? PEER REVIEW meaning - PEER REVIEW definition - PEER REVIEW explanation. Source: Wikipedia.org article, adapted under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ license. SUBSCRIBE to our Google Earth flights channel - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6UuCPh7GrXznZi0Hz2YQnQ Peer review is the evaluation of work by one or more people of similar competence to the producers of the work (peers). It constitutes a form of self-regulation by qualified members of a profession within the relevant field. Peer review methods are employed to maintain standards of quality, improve performance, and provide credibility. In academia, scholarly peer review is often used to determine an academic paper's suitability for publication. Peer review can be categorized by the type of activity and by the field or profession in which the activity occurs, e.g., medical peer review. Professional peer review focuses on the performance of professionals, with a view to improving quality, upholding standards, or providing certification. In academia, peer review is common in decisions related to faculty advancement and tenure. Henry Oldenburg (1619–1677) was a British philosopher who developed scientific peer review. A prototype professional peer-review process was recommended in the Ethics of the Physician written by Ishaq ibn ‘Ali al-Ruhawi (854–931). He stated that a visiting physician had to make duplicate notes of a patient's condition on every visit. When the patient was cured or had died, the notes of the physician were examined by a local medical council of other physicians, who would decide whether the treatment had met the required standards of medical care. Professional peer review is common in the field of health care, where it is usually called clinical peer review. Further, since peer review activity is commonly segmented by clinical discipline, there is also physician peer review, nursing peer review, dentistry peer review, etc. Many other professional fields have some level of peer review process: accounting, law, engineering (e.g., software peer review, technical peer review), aviation, and even forest fire management. Peer review is used in education to achieve certain learning objectives, particularly as a tool to reach higher order processes in the affective and cognitive domains as defined by Bloom's taxonomy. This may take a variety of forms, including closely mimicking the scholarly peer review processes used in science and medicine. Scholarly peer review (also known as refereeing) is the process of subjecting an author's scholarly work, research, or ideas to the scrutiny of others who are experts in the same field, before a paper describing this work is published in a journal or as a book. The peer review helps the publisher (that is, the editor-in-chief or the editorial board) decide whether the work should be accepted, considered acceptable with revisions, or rejected. Peer review requires a community of experts in a given (and often narrowly defined) field, who are qualified and able to perform reasonably impartial review. Impartial review, especially of work in less narrowly defined or inter-disciplinary fields, may be difficult to accomplish, and the significance (good or bad) of an idea may never be widely appreciated among its contemporaries. Peer review is generally considered necessary to academic quality and is used in most major scientific journals, but it does by no means prevent publication of all invalid research. Traditionally, peer reviewers have been anonymous, but there is currently a significant amount of open peer review, where the comments are visible to readers, generally with the identities of the peer reviewers disclosed as well. The European Union has been using peer review in the 'Open Method of Co-ordination' of policies in the fields of active labour market policy since 1999. In 2004, a program of peer reviews started in social inclusion. Each program sponsors about eight peer review meetings in each year, in which a 'host country' lays a given policy or initiative open to examination by half a dozen other countries and the relevant European-level NGOs. These usually meet over two days and include visits to local sites where the policy can be seen in operation. The meeting is preceded by the compilation of an expert report on which participating 'peer countries' submit comments. The results are published on the web.....
Views: 1600 The Audiopedia
Lifestyle and Medicine for Blood Pressure: What Everyone Needs to Know About the New Guidelines
 
01:33:28
Lifestyle and Medicine for Blood Pressure: What Everyone Needs to Know About the New Guidelines The convergence of evidence suggests that an affordable plant-based diet can help prevent and even reverse some of the top killer diseases in the Western world, and can be even more effective than medication and surgery. This could save Medicare billions of dollars, but medical training continues to underemphasize nutrition education , in part, perhaps, because lifestyle interventions go against the prevailing conventional wisdom. The USDA, in formulating its dietary guidelines, has been accused of both acting with bias and ignoring relevant research. However, the most recent guidelines take a step in the right direction by recommending a shift to a plant-based diet, which Kaiser Permanente, the largest U.S. managed care organization, has moved in the direction of supporting. Lifestyle medicine attempts to find, prevent, and treat the causes of disease. Patients should receive fully informed consent for treatment, meaning they should be informed about all of their options including dietary changes. Doctors report they don’t practice preventative cardiology because they fear their patients won’t change their diet. Kim Allan Williams, MD, MACC, FAHA, MASNC, FESC was born in Chicago, and attended the College of The University of Chicago (1971 to 1975), followed by the University of Chicago’s Pritzker School of Medicine (1975 to 1979), internal medicine residency at Emory University (1979 to 1982), and overlapping fellowships in Cardiology at the University of Chicago (1982 to 1985), Clinical Pharmacology (1984 to 1985), and Nuclear Medicine (1984 to 1986). He is board certified in Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Diseases, Nuclear Medicine, Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Dr. Williams joined the faculty of the University of Chicago in 1986, specializing in clinical cardiology, nuclear medicine, and nuclear cardiology. He served as Professor of Medicine and Radiology and Director of Nuclear Cardiology at The University of Chicago School of Medicine until 2010. Among numerous awards and honors for his teaching in the medical school, residencies and fellowships, he was elected to Alpha Omega Alpha in 2008. In 2010, he became the Dorothy Susan Timmis Endowed Professor of Medicine and Radiology and Chairman of the Division of Cardiology at Wayne State University School of Medicine in Detroit, MI. At Wayne State, he has started the Urban Cardiology Initiative – a program of education of physicians on disparities in healthcare, primary school education on cardiovascular health and community health screening in inner-city Detroit. In November 2013 he returned to Chicago as the James B. Herrick Endowed Professor of Medicine and Cardiology at Rush University Medical Center. Dr. Williams has published numerous peer-reviewed articles, monographs, book chapters, editorials, and review articles in the field of nuclear cardiology and minority health issues, with emphasis on education and innovations in perfusion imaging and quantitation of ventricular function. His research interests include selective adenosine receptor agonists, fluorinated perfusion PET imaging, cardiac computed tomography for plaque characterization, health care disparities and payment policy, and appropriate use of cardiac imaging. Dr. Williams has served on numerous committees and boards at the national level, including the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology (ASNC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the American Medical Association (AMA), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the Certifying Board of Nuclear Cardiology, the Certifying Board of Cardiac Computed Tomography, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography and the Association of Black Cardiologists (ABC). He served as President of ASNC from 2004 to 2005. He served as Chairman of the Board of ABC from 2008 to 2010. He also served on the Cardiovascular Disease Examination Board of the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM-CV) until 2012. He served as the president of the ACC from 2015 to 2016. Connect with The Real Truth About Health http://www.therealtruthabouthealth.com/ https://www.facebook.com/The-Real-Truth-About-Health-467500836655781/ https://www.instagram.com/therealtruthabouthealth/ https://twitter.com/RTAHealth Passionate believers in whole food plant based diets, no chemicals, minimal pharmaceutical drugs, no GMO's. Fighting to stop climate change and extinction.
Article 7 - EM:Prep 2019 LLSA Review
 
16:51
www.emprep.org Weʼve carefully reviewed each LLSA selection in detail, extracted the key points, and presented the information in an easy to digest format. Watch the video, listen to the audio, or read the EM:Prep Notes, and be reminded of the major points of every article as you prepare for your LLSA exams.*
Intro to Systematic Reviews & Meta-Analyses
 
16:57
Here's a brief introduction to how to evaluate systematic reviews.
Views: 185994 Rahul Patwari
Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Medicine
 
06:16
You've probably heard of "evidence-based medicine". It's the idea that we practice based on research and data. There's another way of practicing called "eminence-based medicine". It's the idea that we listen to the person who's been around the longest or who has somehow managed to be labelled the expert. It used to be that such a person would periodically get to write a review article in some journal, and that would be how everyone learned what to do in medicine. That's a problem. We've got a solution. Systematic reviews! For those of you who want to read more or see references, look here: http://theincidentaleconomist.com/wordpress/?p=57771 John Green -- Executive Producer Stan Muller -- Director, Producer Aaron Carroll -- Writer Mark Olsen -- Graphics http://www.twitter.com/aaronecarroll http://www.twitter.com/crashcoursestan http://www.twitter.com/realjohngreen http://www.twitter.com/olsenvideo
Views: 58081 Healthcare Triage
Breastfeeding Medicine Podcast #66 - 2017 Year in Review
 
46:38
2017 Breastfeeding Year in Review with Anne Eglash MD We had a windfall of clinical information hit the journals in 2017, topics ranging from donor milk and complementary feeding to allergies and breastfeeding during pregnancy. Join us for some downright awesome evidence! The Breastfeeding Medicine Podcast was created by Anne Eglash MD, IBCLC, FABM to review recent research articles that have a potential impact on clinical practice. It is available on iTunes, Google Play, and at The Milk Mob website: https://themilkmob.org/podcasts/ Please join us at our Facebook page to share comments and questions! https://www.facebook.com/BreastfeedingMedicinePodcast/ Stay Abreast with the Clinical Question of the Week! Every week The Milk Mob reviews a recent policy statement or other major article that has an impact on best practices in the care of breastfeeding mothers and babies. Reading these are not only quick and easy, but will help you feel more confident when counseling on breastfeeding. Subscribe and get them delivered to your in-box! https://themilkmob.org/questions/
Views: 1193 The Milk Mob
Learning software to systematically review articles
 
02:41
Systematic review of medical research papers can lead to new knowledge and treatments of diseases. The exisiting software tools however, are very limited and often a lot of manual work is involved. Stephen Gilbert of Iowa State University uses artificial intelligence and machine learning to automate these processes.
Views: 238 OpenMinTeD
Physician Assistant and Primary Care Medicine: JAAPA Article Review
 
06:56
Peace be to you all (AsSalama'laikum)! I have read an interesting article in the Journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants about the great need for PAs in Primary Care Medicine. There is a HUGE MD/DO shortage in primary care, especially in rural and inner-city areas. This where PAs can really do a great deal to meet the challenges that this phenomenon presents. However, many PAs are choosing more lucrative specialties like our MD counterparts. And for similar reasons (student loan debt, location, prestige, etc.) If you are a pre-PA or PA student, please consider joining the Student American Academy of Physician Assistants. If you are a PA, it would be good to join AAPA or, at least your state PA organization. Many of the privileges we enjoy today are due to the hard work of these organizations. I wish you all the VERY best of succes in your positive endeavors! Peace! Omar Abdul-Malik DHEd, MPAS, PA-C, CHES [email protected]
Nutrition and Heart Disease: How to Prevent Against Heart Disease by Kim Williams, M.D., MACC, FAHA
 
01:27:44
Nutrition and Heart Disease: How to Prevent Against Heart Disease by Kim Williams, M.D., MACC, FAHA The convergence of evidence suggests that an affordable plant-based diet can help prevent and even reverse some of the top killer diseases in the Western world, and can be even more effective than medication and surgery. This could save Medicare billions of dollars, but medical training continues to underemphasize nutrition education , in part, perhaps, because lifestyle interventions go against the prevailing conventional wisdom. The USDA, in formulating its dietary guidelines, has been accused of both acting with bias and ignoring relevant research. However, the most recent guidelines take a step in the right direction by recommending a shift to a plant-based diet, which Kaiser Permanente, the largest U.S. managed care organization, has moved in the direction of supporting. Lifestyle medicine attempts to find, prevent, and treat the causes of disease. Patients should receive fully informed consent for treatment, meaning they should be informed about all of their options including dietary changes. Doctors report they don’t practice preventative cardiology because they fear their patients won’t change their diet. Kim Allan Williams, MD, MACC, FAHA, MASNC, FESC was born in Chicago, and attended the College of The University of Chicago (1971 to 1975), followed by the University of Chicago’s Pritzker School of Medicine (1975 to 1979), internal medicine residency at Emory University (1979 to 1982), and overlapping fellowships in Cardiology at the University of Chicago (1982 to 1985), Clinical Pharmacology (1984 to 1985), and Nuclear Medicine (1984 to 1986). He is board certified in Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Diseases, Nuclear Medicine, Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Dr. Williams joined the faculty of the University of Chicago in 1986, specializing in clinical cardiology, nuclear medicine, and nuclear cardiology. He served as Professor of Medicine and Radiology and Director of Nuclear Cardiology at The University of Chicago School of Medicine until 2010. Among numerous awards and honors for his teaching in the medical school, residencies and fellowships, he was elected to Alpha Omega Alpha in 2008. In 2010, he became the Dorothy Susan Timmis Endowed Professor of Medicine and Radiology and Chairman of the Division of Cardiology at Wayne State University School of Medicine in Detroit, MI. At Wayne State, he has started the Urban Cardiology Initiative – a program of education of physicians on disparities in healthcare, primary school education on cardiovascular health and community health screening in inner-city Detroit. In November 2013 he returned to Chicago as the James B. Herrick Endowed Professor of Medicine and Cardiology at Rush University Medical Center. Dr. Williams has published numerous peer-reviewed articles, monographs, book chapters, editorials, and review articles in the field of nuclear cardiology and minority health issues, with emphasis on education and innovations in perfusion imaging and quantitation of ventricular function. His research interests include selective adenosine receptor agonists, fluorinated perfusion PET imaging, cardiac computed tomography for plaque characterization, health care disparities and payment policy, and appropriate use of cardiac imaging. Dr. Williams has served on numerous committees and boards at the national level, including the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology (ASNC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the American Medical Association (AMA), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the Certifying Board of Nuclear Cardiology, the Certifying Board of Cardiac Computed Tomography, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography and the Association of Black Cardiologists (ABC). He served as President of ASNC from 2004 to 2005. He served as Chairman of the Board of ABC from 2008 to 2010. He also served on the Cardiovascular Disease Examination Board of the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM-CV) until 2012. He served as the president of the ACC from 2015 to 2016. Connect with The Real Truth About Health http://www.therealtruthabouthealth.com/ https://www.facebook.com/The-Real-Truth-About-Health-467500836655781/ https://www.instagram.com/therealtruthabouthealth/ https://twitter.com/RTAHealth Passionate believers in whole food plant based diets, no chemicals, minimal pharmaceutical drugs, no GMO's. Fighting to stop climate change and extinction.
How Do I Choose the Best Journal for My Paper?
 
05:01
HOW DO I CHOOSE THE BEST JOURNAL FOR MY PAPER? Which journal is the best one in scholarly publishing for my paper? This video lists the decision points when making this decision. MORE VIDEOS on Choosing Which Journal to Publish Your Article https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLqkE49N6nq3jkGjy26P2tVNragL2ik0c2 FIND OUT more about John Bond and his publishing consulting practice at www.RiverwindsConsulting.com SEND IDEAS for John to discuss on Publishing Defined. Email him at [email protected] or see http://www.PublishingDefined.com CONNECT Twitter: https://twitter.com/JohnHBond LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/johnbondnj Google+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/113338584717955505192 Goodreads: https://www.goodreads.com/user/show/51052703-john-bond YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/JohnBond BOOKS by John Bond: The Story of You: http://www.booksbyjohnbond.com/the-story-of-you/about-the-book/ You Can Write and Publish a Book: http://www.booksbyjohnbond.com/you-can-write-and-publish-a-book/about-the-book/ TRANSCRIPT: How do I decide the best journal for my paper? Hi there, I am John Bond from Riverwinds Consulting and this is Publishing Defined. Today I am to going to be discussing how to choose a scholarly journal for you to submit your paper to. A bit about me: I’ve been in scholarly publishing for over 25 year and as Chief Content Officer for a major medical publisher oversaw the publishing of over 20,000 peer reviewed articles. So, you have collected your data and information or completed your study. You have written your paper. Now what? Prior to deciding, make sure you have had the paper read and critiqued by your colleagues and associates. Consider very carefully their feedback and make the changes where you see fit. Remember to give it one more very close check for grammar, spelling, format and style before moving on. Now you are ready. In starting to consider where to submit your paper, create a chart or list of the options under consideration. Include the journals you read and receive; and the ones you respect. Ask your co-workers and colleagues what journals best fit the topic of your paper and have them weigh in on their opinions on the publications. In your chart, list these journal names and their urls. Most journal website will have an About section that will list the Mission or Aims and Scope of the publication. Read them and see if they align with your content and article format. Add to the chart the journal’s frequency; that is monthly, bimonthly, quarterly. Closely review the Information for Authors published for each Journal, likely at their website. This is the best guide to see if your article is a fit and will save everyone time. Read it very closely. Not just their mission but also the specifications for format and types of articles that are interested in. Also, if a journal has an Impact Factor, it may be listed at their website. If not, sometimes searching the web for that journal’s current Impact Factor will give you an answer. List whether the journal is subscription based, or sent to members of a Society, or an Open Access publication. Sometimes a journal may be more than one of these. If it is Open Access, check out the APC or Author Processing Charge and include the amount, if any. The more widely the journal is available, for example an Open Access publication, the more your article will get downloaded and read. Next check on where the journal is indexed. For instance, in medicine or nursing, being included in Medline or CINAHL are essential. Check for your area of specialty to see if the journal is covered in your key abstracting and indexing service. Once again, go the website and ensure articles are included online in addition to in the paper version of the journal. Are they posted online at acceptance or only when a print version appears? What may be listed at a website is the average time a paper takes to get from submission to decision and then the time it takes to get from acceptance to being published. If your topic has a sense of urgency to it, this time can be a critical decision. These times may not be publicly available. On occasion, the acceptance rate or rejection rate from the previous year may be listed. This would be a key piece of data as well. Search your topic over at a journal’s website to see if they have published any articles on it over the past two years. Most journals are looking for new or novel takes on existing topics and you might want to see what they have recently published. Finally, submit to just one journal at a time. I know it is tempting to reduce the wait time and send out to many journals or publications, but etiquette (and ethics) demand one at a time only.....
Views: 16090 John Bond
Article 3 - EM:Prep 2019 LLSA Review
 
22:21
www.emprep.org Weʼve carefully reviewed each LLSA selection in detail, extracted the key points, and presented the information in an easy to digest format. Watch the video, listen to the audio, or read the EM:Prep Notes, and be reminded of the major points of every article as you prepare for your LLSA exams.*
How to Appraise a Systematic Review and Meta Analysis in Clinical Practice
 
21:09
Dr Sanil Rege, Consultant Psychiatrist from Psych Scene takes you through a critical appraisal of a research paper outlining the key points in evaluating a Systematic Review and Meta Analysis. Take Home Messages : 1) A systematic review is a compilation of (usually) pooled RCTs which together give a combined review. 2) A graphical representation of a systematic review is a meta-analysis. 3) Large amounts of information can be assimilated quickly by healthcare providers, researchers, and policymakers.
Views: 5917 PsychScene Hub
How to Critically Appraise a Systematic Review: Part 1
 
07:42
Part 1 of a 2 part series on how to critically appraise systematic reviews
Views: 60943 Terry Shaneyfelt
Guided Tour of a Scholarly Journal Article - Medicine Article
 
01:28
View Guided Tour of a Scholarly Journal Article first. This is an example from a medicine article.
Views: 513 nettutorOSUL
Understanding synthesis (systematic) review articles
 
01:55
This video explains the difference between summary and synthesis reviews. From the Making Decisions Better: The Information Mastery Curriculum and Assessment Program, an evidence-based medicine teaching program from Clinical Information Sciences, http://ClinicalInformationSciences.com.
Journal Article Review Presentation
 
05:45
PSYC299 - Applied Statistics Strother
Views: 38624 hellorollolazo
Year in Review - Medical Critical Care – Munish Luthra, MD
 
34:25
Munish Luthra, MD Assistant Professor of Pulmonary and Critical Care Emory University School of Medicine Procalcitonin as an Early Marker of the Need for Invasive Respiratory or Vasopressor Support in Adults With Community-Acquired Pneumonia http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012369216485600 Effect of Hydrocortisone on Development of Shock Among Patients With Severe Sepsis The HYPRESS Randomized Clinical Trial http://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2565176 Effect of Early Vasopressin vs Norepinephrine on Kidney Failure in Patients With Septic Shock The VANISH Randomized Clinical Trial http://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2540403 Prognostic Accuracy of Sepsis-3 Criteria for In-Hospital Mortality Among Patients With Suspected Infection Presenting to the Emergency Department http://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2598268 See the 2017 Summit Program at http://www.criticalcaresummit.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/2017-Summit-Handbook.pdf
Musculoskeletal System Journal Article Review
 
10:06
Medical Terminology LSSU Spring 2019 Medical Word Journal Article Presentation. All photos were taken from Google with the filtered search of "Labeled for Reuse". All photos are used legally.
Views: 28 Adam Moffatt
IUSOM REVIEW ARTICLES: PROTOCOL GUIDELINES FOR INVESTIGATIONS OF PHOTOCHEMICAL FATE OF PESTICIDES
 
04:03
In March 2011, IUSOM International Medical Consultant Inc., a daughter entity of International University School of Medicine (IUSOM), located in Bonaire, Dutch Caribbean (Formerly Netherlands Antilles), published a Digital / Electronic Version of the Review Article, Namely, "Protocol Guidelines for the Investigations of Photochemical Fate of Pesticides in Water, Air and Soils" (IUSOM Code: IUSOM-REV-ART-2011-0001) by Ghulam Ghaus Choudhry and G.R. Barrie Webster. The Digital IUSOM Review Article, "Protocol Guidelines for the Investigations of Photochemical Fate of Pesticides in Water, Air and Soils" (IUSOM Code: IUSOM-REV-ART-2011-0001) by Ghulam Ghaus Choudhry and G.R. Barrie Webster, Publishers: IUSOM International Medical Consultant Inc., reviews and states: - Existing Test Guidelines and Revised Protocol Guidelines Applicable to the Investigations of Photochemical Fate of Pesticides; - Requirement of the Three Sorts of Research Area, namely: 1. Direct Phototransformation of Pesticidal Chemicals, 2. Indirect Phototransformation of Pesticidal Chemicals, and 3. Likely Photoincorporations of Pesticidal Chemicals into Humic Macromolecules and Humic Model Monomers as well into other Environmental Chemicals and Species; - Requirement of the Identification of the Photoproducts of Pesticides; and - Requirement for the Research Determining Sunlight Phototransformation Rate Constants and the Corresponding Sunlight Half-Lives of Pesticides occurring in Water, Air and Soils. For Free reading on-line the Digital / Electronic Version of the IUSOM Review Article, namely, "Protocol Guidelines for the Investigations of Photochemical Fate of Pesticides in Water, Air and Soils" (IUSOM Code: IUSOM-REV-ART-2011-0001) by Ghulam Ghaus Choudhry and G.R. Barrie Webster, Publishers: IUSOM International Medical Consultant Inc., please visit: http://www.internationaluniversity-schoolofmedicine.org/files/PROTOCOL_GUIDELINES_FOR_THE__INVESTIGATIONS__OF_PHOTOCHEMICAL_FATE_OF_PESTICIDES_IN_WATER_AIR_AND_SOILS_BY_CHOUDHRY_AND_WEBSTER.pdf For Purchasing on-line the Digital copy of the IUSOM Review Article, "Protocol Guidelines for the Investigations of Photochemical Fate of Pesticides in Water, Air and Soils" (IUSOM Code: IUSOM-REV-ART-2011-0001) by Ghulam Ghaus Choudhry and G.R. Barrie Webster, Publishers: IUSOM International Medical Consultant Inc., at the Sale Price of US $9.99, please contact IUSOM at: [email protected] It is further announced that International University School of Medicine (IUSOM) is currently accepting applications from international students for Admissions for the Doctor of Medicine (M.D.) Degree Program as well as for Pre-Medical (PreMed) Program for September 2011 Semester and for the subsequent semesters, to be offered at its Worldwide Campuses located at Bonaire (Dutch Caribbean) (Formerly Netherlands Antilles), Barranquilla (Colombia), México City (México), and Sialkot (Pakistan). For acquiring information on Admission Requirements, Admissions Application Process, PreMed and M.D. Degree Curriculums, and Fees Structures at IUSOM, please visit: http://www.internationaluniversity-schoolofmedicine.org/Admissions as well IUSOM website pages cited therein. You may apply on-line for admission using a fill-in version of Admission Application Form, by visiting: http://www.internationaluniversity-schoolofmedicine.org/files/IUSOM_MD_ADMISSION_APPLICATION_FORM4D.pdf or http://www.internationaluniversity-schoolofmedicine.org/files/IUSOM_PREMED_ADMISSION_APPLICATION_FORM4D.pdf
Views: 58 IUSOM
Gastroenterology - The National EM Board Review Course
 
01:48:19
Purchase the self-study program or attend the live course at www.emboards.com The National Emergency Medicine Board Review course is a four-day, 34.75-hour total immersion “boot-camp” in the factual database of emergency medicine. The goal of the course to help participants pass their exams—drives the content. At the conclusion, participants, through repetition, will have learned the key information needed to pass emergency medicine qualifying and ConCert™ examinations.
♡ Laurens Hope Medical ID Bracelet Review! | Amy Lee Fisher ♡
 
17:02
♡ Laurens Hope Medical ID Bracelet Review! ♡ Laurens Hope Website: https://shareasale.com/r.cfm?b=1195468&u=1792920&m=51477&urllink=&afftrack= The Kaye (1st Bracelet): https://shareasale.com/r.cfm?b=1195416&u=1792920&m=51477&urllink=&afftrack= $58.99 Forever & Always ( 2nd Bracelet): https://shareasale.com/r.cfm?b=1195415&u=1792920&m=51477&urllink=&afftrack= $49.99 Avery Smart Fit, Slip On (3rd Bracelet) : https://shareasale.com/r.cfm?b=1195413&u=1792920&m=51477&urllink=&afftrack= Normally $54.99 currently $46.74 with the code: SLIPON15 (ends today 15/06/18) BUT YOUR GUYS ARE IN LUCK! There is a HUGE Flash Sale currently on! So make sure to pick up one of these gorgeous bracelets whilst you still can, for amaizng prices! The sale is website wide! So Go go go! CHECK OUT MY MERCH & Help Support My Channel! Amy's Life (Classic Logo): https://www.bonfire.com/amys-life-merch/ Amy's Life ( 'AL' Plain Logo): https://www.bonfire.com/amys-life-merch-al-plain-logo/ Amy's Life ('AL' Zebra Design): https://www.bonfire.com/amys-life-merch-zebra-al-design/ Want To Send Me Mail? PO Box 62 Willetton WA Australia 6955 Find Me On the Net! ► VLOG CHANNEL: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSMv... ►INSTAGRAM: https://www.instagram.com/chronically.ams/?hl=en ►INSTAGRAM: https://www.instagram.com/_amieelee/ ►INSTAGRAM: https://www.instagram.com/tomharris.95/ ►TWITTER: https://mobile.twitter.com/AmyLeeFisher ►SNAPCHAT: @Amyleefisher96 ►PAYPAL ( if you would like to donate to help me out, as it was highly requested for me to leave my details) : [email protected] Popular Videos to Check Out! ★ POTS Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2gdwj... ☆ Faces of Chronic Illness Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QrInL... ★ Gastroparesis Awareness Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1jUBR... ☆ All about my feeding tube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3kOjd... ★ Ehlers Danlos Syndrome Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b26GL... ☆ How to place a Feeding Tube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TWW52... ★ How to remove a Feeding Tube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3LCG2... ♡ MORE INFO ABOUT MY HEALTH ♡ • HKPP: https://medlineplus.gov/ency/article/... • POTS: http://www.nhs.uk/conditions/postural... • M.E/CFS: http://www.nhs.uk/conditions/Chronic-... • FIBRO: http://www.nhs.uk/Conditions/ Fibromyalgia/Pages/Introduction.aspx • EDS: http://www.nhs.uk/Conditions/ehlers-d... • GASTROPARESIS: http://www.nhs.uk/conditions/gastropa... • MCAD: http://www.ukmasto.org/ukmasto-medica... —————————————-­­—————-------------------­——
Views: 17831 Amy Lee Fisher
Is Most Published Research Wrong?
 
12:22
Mounting evidence suggests a lot of published research is false. Check out Audible: http://bit.ly/AudibleVe Support Veritasium on Patreon: http://bit.ly/VePatreon Patreon supporters: Bryan Baker, Donal Botkin, Tony Fadell, Jason Buster, Saeed Alghamdi More information on this topic: http://wke.lt/w/s/z0wmO The Preregistration Challenge: https://cos.io/prereg/ Resources used in the making of this video: Why Most Published Research Findings Are False: http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 Trouble at the Lab: http://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21588057-scientists-think-science-self-correcting-alarming-degree-it-not-trouble Science isn't broken: http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/science-isnt-broken/#part1 Visual effects by Gustavo Rosa
Views: 1999451 Veritasium
STUDENT DOCTOR: JACLYN HILL LIPSTICKS AND PUBLIC HEALTH
 
09:21
hi loves! hope you enjoy. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/the-role-of-fungi-molds-in-human-disease?search=fungus&source=search_result&selectedTitle=2~144&usage_type=default&display_rank=2 https://www.uptodate.com/contents/treatment-of-oropharyngeal-and-esophageal-candidiasis?search=oral%20thrush&source=search_result&selectedTitle=1~150&usage_type=default&display_rank=1 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23590385 https://www.allure.com/story/mold-in-skin-care-products-causes https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4674922/ https://www.fda.gov/cosmetics/cosmetics-labeling/shelf-life-and-expiration-dating-cosmetics https://www.fda.gov/cosmetics/resources-consumers-cosmetics/cosmetics-safety-qa-shelf-life
Views: 55606 Kaur Beauty
(How to write a review article 1) أساسيات البحث العلمي Research Methodology
 
56:43
دورة أسايات البحث العلمي تقام بكلية الطب - جامعة الأزهر شهريا بهيئة ضمان الجودة ووحدة التعليم الطبي ابتداء من نوفمبر 2011 Life style and Goal sitting تجديد النفس والإبداع How to write a review article Scientific thinking Research methodologies Ethics in health research كيفية إعداد عرض كمبيوترpower point مهارات التحدث امام الجمهور PRESENTATION SKILLS https://www.facebook.com/AlAzharMedicalStudentsResearchTrainingProgram https://www.facebook.com/ScientificResearchTraining http://www3.youm7.com/News.asp?NewsID=582845&SecID=245&IssueID=168
Views: 7395 MOKH TAR